GMS:FEMWATER Reference Manual

From XMS Wiki - http://wikis.aquaveo.com/xms/

FEMWATER
Pre-processing
Building a FEMWATER Model
FEMWATER Model Input
Saving a FEMWATER Simulation
Post-processing
FEMWATER Display Options
FEMWATER Post Processing Viewing Options
Tutorials
FEMWATER Tutorials
This box: view • talk • edit

References

• Anderman, E.R.& Hill, M.C., MODFLOW-2000, THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MODULAR GROUND-WATE MODEL-DOCUMENTATION OF THE HYDROGEOLOGIC-UNIT FLOW (HUF) PACKAGE, USGS, Denver, CO, 2000.

• Carle, Steven F., T-PROGS: Transition Probability Geostatistical Software Version 2.1, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group University of California, Davis, 1999.

• Clough, R. W., and J. L. Tocher, 1965, Finite element stiffness matrices for analysis of plates in bending, Proc. Conf. Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics, Wright-Patterson A.F.B., Ohio, Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab., Research and Technology Division, Air Force Systems Command, The Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, pp. 515-545.

• Davis, J.C., 1986, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 550 p.

• Deutsch, C.V., & A.G. Journel, 1992, GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide, Oxford University Press, New York, 340 p.

• Franke, R. & G. Nielson, 1980, "Smooth interpolation of large sets of scattered data," International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 15, pp. 1691-1704.

• Franke, R., 1982, "Scattered data interpolation: tests of some methods," Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 38, No. 157, pp. 181-200.

• Harbaugh, A., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., & McDonald, M.G., MODFLOW-2000, THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MODULAR GROUND-WATER MODEL-USER GUIDE TO MODULARIZATION CONCEPTS AND THE GROUND-WATER FLOW PROCESS, USGS, Reston, VA, 2000.

• Heine, G. W., 1986, "A controlled study of some two-dimensional interpolation methods," COGS Computer Contributions, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 60-72.

• Jones, N. L., 1990, Solid Modeling of Earth Masses for Applications in Geotechnical Engineering, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 324 p.

• Journel, A.G., & Huijbregts, C.J., 1978, Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York, NY.

• Lam, N.S., 1983, "Spatial interpolation methods: a review," The American Cartographer, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 129-149.

• Lancaster, Peter and Kestutis Salkauskas, 1986, Curve and Surface Fitting, Academic Press, London, 280 pp.

• Lin, H.C., D.R. Richards, G.T. Yeh, J.R. Cheng, H.P. Chang, N.L. Jones, 1996, FEMWATER: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Computer Model for Simulating Density Dependent Flow and Transport, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report, 129 p.

• McDonald, M.G., & A.W. Harbaugh, 1988, A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, Techniques of Water Resources Investigations 06-A1, United States Geological Survey.

• Moore, David S., 1995, The basic principles of statistics, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.

• Olea, R.A., 1974, "Optimal contour mapping using universal kriging." J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 695-702.

• Owen, S.J., 1992, An implementation of natural neighbor interpolation in three dimensions, Master's Thesis, Brigham Young University, 119 p.

• Philip, G.M., & D.F. Watson, 1986, "Comment on 'comparing splines and kriging,'" Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 243-245.

• Pollock, D.W., 1994, User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite difference ground-water model, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94-464, Reston, Virginia, Sept., 1994.

• Prudic, David E., 1989, Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, ground-water flow model, USGS Open-File Report 88-729, Carson City, Nevada.

• Royle, A. G., F. L. Clausen, & P. Frederiksen, 1981, "Practical universal kriging and automatic contouring," Geo-Processing, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 377-394.

• Shepard, D., 1968, "A two dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data," Proc. 23rd National Conference of the ACM, pp. 517-523.

• Sibson, R., 1981, "A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation," Interpreting Multivariate Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 21-36.

• Watson, D. F. and G. M. Philip, 1985, A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation, Geo-Processing, Vol., 2, No. 4, pp. 315-327.

• WES, 1994, FEMWATER Reference Manual, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.

• Wingle, W.L., E.P. Poeter and S.A. McKenna, 1995, UNCERT User's Guide: A Geostatistical Uncertainty Analysis Package Applied to Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Modeling, Colorado School of Mines. http://uncert.mines.edu/.

• Yeh, G.T., S.S. Hansen, B. Lester, R. Strobl, J. Scarbrough, 1992, 3DFEMWATER/3DLEWASTE: Numerical Codes for Delineating Wellhead Protection Areas in Agricultural Regions Based on the Assimilative Capacity Criterion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

• Zheng, C., Wang, P., 1998, "MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems." University of Alabama.

v • d • e GMS - Groundwater Modeling System
Modules:	2D Grid · 2D Mesh · 2D Scatter Point · 3D Grid · 3D Mesh · 3D Scatter Point · Boreholes · GIS · Map · Solid · TINs
Models:	ADH · ART3D · FEMWATER · MODAEM · MODFLOW · MODPATH · MT3DMS · PEST · RT3D · SEAM3D · SEAWAT · SEEP2D · T-PROGS · UTCHEM · UTEXAS · ZONEBUDGET
Aquaveo