WMS:Overview of Floodplain Delineation: Difference between revisions

From XMS Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:*[[WMS:TIN Guidelines|Prepare a triangulated irregular network]] (TIN) surface of the area where the delineation is to be performed. This can be done by reading scattered elevation, converting from a DEM, or digitizing a contour map.
:*[[WMS:TIN Guidelines|Prepare a triangulated irregular network]] (TIN) surface of the area where the delineation is to be performed. This can be done by reading scattered elevation, converting from a DEM, or digitizing a contour map.


:[[Image:image430.gif]]
:[[Image:FloodPlainDelineation1.gif]]


:*[[WMS:Preparing Stage Data|Prepare the water surface elevation data]]. Water elevations data consists of a series of surface water elevations points defined as x, y, z (where z is the elevation of the water surface). Such points could be the results of a hydraulic model simulation, calculated in the WMS channel calculator, or retrieved from a known gaging station. They are stored as a [[WMS:Scatter Point Sets|scatter dataset]].
:*[[WMS:Preparing Stage Data|Prepare the water surface elevation data]]. Water elevations data consists of a series of surface water elevations points defined as x, y, z (where z is the elevation of the water surface). Such points could be the results of a hydraulic model simulation, calculated in the WMS channel calculator, or retrieved from a known gaging station. They are stored as a [[WMS:Scatter Point Sets|scatter dataset]].

Revision as of 15:23, 22 April 2015

In addition to stream network and drainage basin delineation, WMS can also be used to perform floodplain delineation. Water levels simulated by a river hydraulic model or collected from different sources are read from a text file as a scatter dataset (see preparing stage data for more help). A smooth water surface is constructed by interpolating water levels at TIN vertices. User specified flood barriers such as embankments, roads, etc are also considered during this process. This surface is then intersected with the triangles in TIN representing the ground elevations, and the resulting set of edges defines the floodplain.

The basic steps to performing a flood plain delineation in WMS include:

  • Prepare a triangulated irregular network (TIN) surface of the area where the delineation is to be performed. This can be done by reading scattered elevation, converting from a DEM, or digitizing a contour map.
File:FloodPlainDelineation1.gif
  • Prepare the water surface elevation data. Water elevations data consists of a series of surface water elevations points defined as x, y, z (where z is the elevation of the water surface). Such points could be the results of a hydraulic model simulation, calculated in the WMS channel calculator, or retrieved from a known gaging station. They are stored as a scatter dataset.
File:Image431.gif
  • Select the appropriate options for delineating the flood plain, including the possibility of using a barrier coverage, and then delineate the flood.
File:Image432.gif
  • The result of the flood plain delineation will be a new dataset of water surface elevations and/or inundation depths. These datasets can be used to display contours on the TIN and converted to a series of output coverages (maps), including a flood depth map and impact maps derived from two separate delineations.

Stochastic Modeling

The flood plain delineation tools are connected with the HEC-1 hydrologic model and HEC-RAS hydraulic model to perform a series of floodplains based on the results of a series of model runs where rainfall, CN, and Manning's are varied stochastically within a range of valid results.

Differences From Earlier Versions (Version 6.0 and earlier)

The new method differs from the previous method in several aspects. The locations of water levels and their section criteria for interpolation are more flexible than the previous method. Ability to incorporate user defined flood barriers as coverage provides an excellent opportunity to overcome the limitations inherent in digital terrain models. It also becomes useful in evaluating “what if” or post project scenarios. The new method provides several options to present flood depth data that are not available in the older method. In addition to conceptual and computational differences between two methods, users will also notice following changes while using the new method:

  • Water levels are read as a scatter dataset as opposed to flood stages at TIN vertices.
  • The method does not require “streams” in the TIN.
  • Multiple events or water level time series can be read as oppose to a single event. User can choose an event while delineating floodplain.
  • User can specify flood barriers as features in the flood barrier coverage and the new method incorporates those features during flood depth computation.
  • Computed flood depths are stored as TIN dataset and saved along with the TIN.
  • Multiple flood depth datasets can be created in a TIN from multiple events.
  • In addition to displaying flood depth as contours, this method can also create flood extent and classified flood depth coverage.
  • It is now possible to compare two different flooding scenarios by creating a flood impact coverage.
  • Finally flood extent, classified flood depth, and flood impact coverages can be exported as shapefiles for reporting or other flood management purposes.

Related Topics